What are the cornerstones of mastering academic writing skills? Academics state that the most effective ways in shaping up one’s science writing performance are practicing, reading educational materials, and, to most students’ surprise, looking through paper samples developed by experienced writers. Reading samples is a highly beneficial step for gaining academic writing proficiency, being the fundamental source of developing sharp academic perception for all expert writers working for popular online writing companies like the BuyEssay writing service.
How can samples sharpen your writing insight, then? Created by seasoned writers with strong academic astuteness, paper samples are a great tool for understanding how to write according to academic standards. Samples provide students with the essential knowledge on how to how to create academic papers, what should be included there, and what structure they need to have. Perusing a sample allows students to get some cues on what the purpose of their writing is as well as figure out how to fulfill it in their papers.
For some reason, many college kids undervalue the importance of checking out samples, which forms a huge gap in their writing proficiency and affects their capability to develop an adequate piece. As the easiest and one of the most effective techniques of harnessing science writing, reading samples bridges students’ academic clumsiness with advanced writing competence. Yes, samples do assist you in transitioning from basic writing capacity to academic excellence. That being said, we invite you to take a look at our profound sample!
Does The Death Penalty Stop Crime?
Nowadays, the three most prominent countries in the world, the USA, India, and China, apply the death penalty.
Nevertheless, since the death penalty was abolished for the first time in 1863 in Venezuela, 140 countries have abolished the death penalty, acknowledging its cruelty and inefficiency
I do believe the death penalty is not a way to solve the crime, and this essay aims to prove it.
A leader of the fight against the death penalty, the NGO Amnesty International, is stating this measure does not deter crime.
The NGO often refers to studies conducted in Northern America in the early 2000s: In 2004, in the USA, the average homicide rate in the states applying the death penalty was 5.71 for 100,000 inhabitants. In States where the death penalty was abolished, this rate was 4.02 for 100,000 inhabitants.
FBI statistics of 2005 confirm this trend over the decade 1995 – 2005 and highlight the inefficiency of the death penalty as a way of stopping crimes.
Canada abolished the death penalty in 1976. In 2003, figures showed the homicide rate was 44% lower than in 1975.
More specifically, a study conducted in 2009 by the French criminal police showed than 75% of murders are passionate crimes, which cannot, by nature, be contained. This, again, confirms the death penalty has no deterrent effect.
In conclusion, too many studies show the inefficiency of the death penalty, as crimes rate does not increase in abolitionist countries and as most of the crimes cannot be prevented.
